Friday, September 9, 2011

Romans 13

“If there is no final place for civil disobedience, then the government has been put in the place of the Living God, because then you are to obey it even when it tells you in its own way to worship Caesar. And that point is exactly where the early Christians performed their own acts of civil disobedience even where it costs them their own lives." Francis Schaefer
After posting this quote I was asked; “Where is this found? If so then how do you read Romans 13?”
The quote is from the “Christian Manifesto” written in response to the Humanist Manifesto. If you are asking where did the early Christians practice civil disobedience, one merely need look at how many refused to deny their faith, refused to sacrifice to idols, or worship the emperor, and for so doing forfeited their lives. Every one of the apostles except John was martyred; they defied government by preaching Jesus, and defied government by not worshipping and sacrificing to idols and false gods. Recent history likewise gives examples of believers who have stood against the pagan god state, from Richard Wurmbrand who began the Voice of the Martyrs Ministry, Dietrich Boenhoeffer “The Cost of Discpleship”, and Corrie Ten Boom “The Hiding Place”, not to mention believers in countries such as China, Iraq, Turkey, etc. I would like to point out that an idol can be most anything, but it is always something that was created, oftentimes it is something that man made himself. Be it a totem pole, a statue, a religious system, a monarch, a state, a flag etc. Men have bowed themselves to the sun, the moon, snakes, cats, lions, trees you name it they have done it. Government is a creation of man, God’s form of government is laid out in scripture and unfortunately it is not the government that the founding fathers of this United States gave to us. They did however touch on truths of scripture in The Declaration of Independence and with a written Constitution (law) which limited the power and scope of government and those within government.
There are many examples of believers in both Old and new testaments that shed light on Romans 13, and where our duty and loyalties are to be placed.
1Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
The higher powers are the powers that are established and ordained by God. There is no power except those established and ordained by God. These are the powers we are to submit to.
Pagans often put their altars and places of worship on high places, these are and have often been places where men have ruled and exerted force over other men. Are there powers or forces outside of those established and ordained by God? “They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not: of their silver and their gold have they made them idols, that they may be cut off.” Hosea 8:4 How about this force? “But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.” Daniel10:13 and “Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come.” Daniel10:20
These are angels, those appointed, established and set in position by God, and the prince of Persia is in opposition in rebellion and at war with the same higher powers set by God.
The word higher means superior, supreme, better, elevated, excellency, but what of these other forces? How about Satan? “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.” Isaiah 14:12-15
Now let us just look back to the ancients –how about the titans of old, you know the old gods? Does the bible talk about these as well? As a matter of fact it does. What does the word giant mean? Nphil or nephilim it means bully, tyrant it comes from the word naphal to fall, or to be cast down. Let us look at a few titans, Nimrod, Osiris, Baal, Merodach, Apollyon, Adonis, Melqart, Tammuz, Baachus etc… You may say these are just myths, may be so, but did the Egyptians worship pharaoh as the reincarnation of their god? The answer is yes, similar to all the other pagan religions, was not the Roman emperor god, the emperor of China the son of heaven? In life they were the gods of living, they arose god of the dead. In Egypt Horus is the son of Osiris, I will not go into the details of how Isis came to be pregnant from a dead man with a vital missing organ to accomplish the task, but every Phallus or Obelisk you see including the one in Washington DC speaks to this legend. The question which is important is why? In the world we live in today, many deny evil exists, let alone that Satan is real, but he does, and his goals and agenda have not changed since Isaiah wrote, and he is as busy today as ever. Going to and fro and trafficking across the earth. Now the question is; is he a higher power? Are men who like Satan desire God’s place and throne and who are worshipped as gods, powers appointed and set by God? I think we find the answer in the word nephilim and its root and in Isaiah’s description. They are fallen, cut down, cast down. They are temporal, their power is not eternal, nor are they superior, or excellent or any such thing, they are death, and their way is death, and lead down to hell and the pit. The higher powers ordained by God are eternal, they are everlasting, they are living and they are life.
When Israel set up kings that God knew not, they were judged and punished.
How do we know if the Higher powers are of God?
3For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
Now Paul asks a question, Wilt thou not be afraid of the power? This brings to mind Joshua and Caleb and the ten spies, the ten spies saw the giants and they were afraid, “we are as grasshoppers in their sight”! Joshua and Caleb stood apart from all the rest, they saw the giants, their great strength and size but they knew that God was greater than the giants and that He would go before them and defeat the giants and give them the land He had promised.
God tells us through Paul, That the authorities that are appointed by God are not a terror to good works, but to evil! The authorities ordained by God praise the good, they uphold righteousness. The authorities, powers appointed and ordained by God are ministers to thee of good if you do right, but they execute wrath upon them that doeth evil. This defines what powers are appointed by God.5Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
So we are to do that which is right because the higher powers will execute wrath upon those who do that which is wicked, and for conscience sake.
Jesus said; ‘But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.” Luke 12:5
Your conscience is what tells you what is right and wrong; it distinguishes between good and evil. It is our conscience that must dictate when a power asks or demands of us what is evil. I might add that God would not have us do evil or in any way promote it! Any force or power that requires, commands or coerces a person to do that which is evil or wickedness is not of God.
If Romans 13 is in fact to be read that we are to be obedient to the state, and that every government is set in place by God no matter how tyrannical, how evil, or how wicked then we should find examples of great men and women in the Bible acting out this principle. What we find in fact is precisely the opposite.
We will start in Exodus. . “And he (pharaoh) said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live. But the midwives feared God, and did not as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the men children alive.” Exodus 1:16-17 How did God view the disobedience of the midwives to the government which set itself against God? “Therefore God dealt well with the midwives: and the people multiplied, and waxed very mighty. And it came to pass, because the midwives feared God, that he made them houses” Exodus1:20-21
Next we will move forward to Joshua “And the king of Jericho sent unto Rahab, saying, Bring forth the men that are come to thee, which are entered into thine house: for they be come to search out all the country. And the woman took the two men, and hid them” Joshua 2: 3-4 According to scripture Rahab defied the earthly King. What was the consequence and how did God react to this defiance of government by Rahab. He saved her and her entire household, everyone else was killed. “And Joshua saved Rahab the harlot alive, and her father's household, and all that she had; and she dwelleth in Israel even unto this day; because she hid the messengers, which Joshua sent to spy out Jericho” Joshua 6:25 Rahab is one of the most renown women in scripture, she also was distinguished in being included in the lineage of Messiah! “And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse.” Matthew1:5
Let us move forward to Daniel “Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, answered and said to the king, O Nebuchadnezzar, we are not careful to answer thee in this matter. If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O king. But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up. Daniel 3:16-18 Did God allow them to be burned up in the fiery furnace since they were not obedient to the government and earthly king? No in fact God walked among them in the fiery furnace!
“Then these presidents and princes assembled together to the king, and said thus unto him, King Darius, live forever. All the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, and the princes, the counsellers, and the captains, have consulted together to establish a royal statute, and to make a firm decree, that whosoever shall ask a petition of any God or man for thirty days, save of thee, O king, he shall be cast into the den of lions. Now, O king, establish the decree, and sign the writing, that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not. Therefore king Darius signed the writing and the decree. Now when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house; and his windows being open in his chamber toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime. Then these men assembled, and found Daniel praying and making supplication before his God. Then they came near, and spake before the king concerning the king's decree; Hast thou not signed a decree, that every man that shall ask a petition of any God or man within thirty days, save of thee, O king, shall be cast into the den of lions? The king answered and said, The thing is true, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not. Then answered they and said before the king, That Daniel, which is of the children of the captivity of Judah, regardeth not thee, O king, nor the decree that thou hast signed, but maketh his petition three times a day.” Daniel 6:6-13
Daniel defied the counselors, the captains, governors presidents, princes and king? Daniel was thrown into the Lion’s den, but he did not die, he lived. The angel tells us of God’s attitude towards Daniel. “At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved!” Daniel in 9:23
Next we will examine Peter and the apostles. ““And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus. But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.” Acts 4:18-20 Both Peter and John make it clear that they will continue to speak and witness to what they have seen and heard concerning Jesus the messiah and the word of God in direct disobedience to the command of the authorities. “And being let go, they went to their own company, and reported all that the chief priests and elders had said unto them. And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is: Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things? The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ. Acts 4:23-26
Did you read that? The kings of the earth stood up and the rulers gathered together against the Lord and against his Christ! Now as the apostles said they would continue to act and speak in defiance of the council once again they find themselves back where they started; “they set them before the council: and the high priest asked them, Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us. Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.” Acts 5: 27-29 Let me repeat that once more. “We ought to obey God rather than men.”
Lastly we must examine Paul the writer of Romans 13. “In Damascus the governor under Aretas the king kept the city of the Damascenes with a garrison, desirous to apprehend me: And through a window in a basket was I let down by the wall, and escaped his hands.” 2 Corinthians 11:32-33
How is it that Paul would dare to flee from the authorities when they were desirous to apprehend him if it is God’s will to submit and obey all manmade institutions because they are ordained of God? Because all powers or forces are not of God, in fact many stand and raise themselves up in opposition to God.
That there are things which are high that are not of God Paul tells us. “For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ; And having in a readiness to revenge all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled” 2 Corinthians 10:3-6
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places” Ephesians 6:12
“In all of antiquity, the Hebrew Bible is the single document that consistently advances the essential ideas which comprise the contemporary belief in “civil disobedience,” unequivocally articulating principles which, when they were first advanced, were alien to the entire world: That there is an absolute of right and wrong that transcends the decrees of the state; that the state has no right to rule if it rules unjustly; that conscience and not the state must be the ultimate arbiter of the actions of every man; that individual disobedience is justified and obligatory in the face of state injustice; and that resistance and even the overthrow of the state are justified and obligatory in cases of unbearable tyranny. Indeed, the biblical narrative consists in large part of explicit indictments of both Jewish and non-Jewish governments for the injustice of their laws and the unjust behavior of their rulers—accounts in which those who are capable of acting independently and offering resistance are in every case depicted as the heroes.” Dr. Yoram Hazony
“The call for submission to God does not in any way connote a call to submit to human authority; indeed, it is the exact opposite. For God’s will in the Bible can be considered similar to what is referred to in secular terms as higher law or universal justice. To equate obedience to the dictates of justice with obedience to injustice is to miss the point of the entire Bible, which is that the individual must obey only the dictates of moral truth, even when these violate the dictates of the state.
The background for the disobedience teaching of the Jewish Bible is its message of individual moral responsibility, which is the cornerstone of the Jewish faith. Unlike the heroes of other ancient narratives, the figures of the books of Moses are neither royalty nor nobility; nor, after the fashion of modern literature, are they democratic figures at the bottom of the social structure. Instead, Abraham and his descendants are shepherds, who view civilization from outside, looking down from the hills at the doings of society and state as they chart their own independent course through the wilderness. “Dr. Yoram Hazony
We did not discuss Moses mother, pharaoh's daughter, Esther, Obadiah, John the Baptist, etc… etc. Every apostle save John was murdered by authorities, and John was imprisoned, and we have not even discussed the prophets. These are real individual people, who sought to please God rather than men, they were not disobedient to God, they served him, and walked in His ways.
6For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
We pay tribute to the ministers of God. A minister implies a person who looks after, cares for, tends after, and comforts. Jesus ministered to the people, as did the apostles and disciples. To be God’s minister you must be within God’s will.
7Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.
We are to render tribute, custom, and honour to whom they are due, this means to who are entitled and deserving. Let us take a look at One greater and wiser than Paul.
“And they asked him, saying, Master, we know that thou sayest and teachest rightly, neither acceptest thou the person of any, but teachest the way of God truly: Is it lawful for us to give tribute unto Caesar, or no? But he perceived their craftiness, and said unto them, Why tempt ye me? Shew me a penny. Whose image and superscription hath it? They answered and said, Caesar's. And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's. And they could not take hold of his words before the people: and they marvelled at his answer, and held their peace.” Luke 20:21-26
He asked them, “Whose image and whose superscription does it have?” They answered Caesars. Take a good look at your dollar Federal Reserve Note, let us look at what is on it. At the top right corner there is an owl, Lilith the succubus-the screech owl or the god Molech. The all seeing eye at the top of the pyramid is the eye of Horus. Notice the capstone has not been placed. The dollar is full of symbols and magick (alchemy-Taking something worthless and making it into gold) acknowledging their god-Lucifer, and his one world order.
Now what is of interest, for those of us who serve Jesus and know that he is the stone the builders rejected, a stone not made with hands, the foundation and corner stone, is that a cornerstone is NOT a capstone, a foundation stone is what you build upon, a capstone is what you build up to, a high thing, like the tower of Babel. The goal is to become gods to raise their dead god! So render unto Caesar (god) what is Caesars. Give him his notes- his IOUs, his debt bills. It is a system of unjust weights and measures, and a major devise of the Mystery Babylon system. God tells us about this system and he calls us to “Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:4
An even more important question for the believer is whose are you? Are you Caesar’s? Whose image and likeness are you made in, whose image do you bear? “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them” Genesis” 1:26-27
This clarifies that I am not the property of government or any manmade institution. More than that even “Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men.” 1Corinthians 7:23 “And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power. Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid. What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh. But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication(unlawful lust, the practice of idolatry) sinneth against his own body. What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.” 1 Corinthians 6:14-20
Again Scripture makes clear that I am not the property of the state, the federal government, a king, or an emperor claiming for themselves the role and place of God. I am a child of God, a servant of the King of Kings, and He is the Most High. He is first and foremost before anything else!
The following defines God’s law and the purpose of all law.
8 Owe no man anything, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. 9For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
Owe no man anything, the present government in this country as well as every other has a debt based currency system. Therefore it violates God’s law. Adultery is infidelity, unfaithfulness, disloyalty, betrayal, deceitfulness, treachery, not only does the government and those who hold office practice such things, they encourage those who reside within their power to do the same. Thou shalt not kill; how many innocent women and children has this country’s military killed in third world countries? As a believer just desiring a thing in one’s heart makes one guilty, so how about this comment made by Hoffa to warm up the crowd for the president of these United States “take these son-of-a-bitches out” not only do these kill, they incite others to violence. Thou shalt not steal, the definition of legal plunder is as follows: “See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong.” Not only does the law made by the powers that be do so, it encourages coveting. A whole system is in place to make one yearn for and desire what belongs to someone else, or for what one does not have, making it as if you deserve and are entitled to this or that material possession.
11And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. 12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. 13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying. 14But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.
A time is coming quickly when believers will be faced with a decision to serve God or serve Satan, to bow to the worldly temporal authorities and receive the mark of the beast, the mark of Satan’s bride of death, or to serve God. Obedience to the authorities in this will mean becoming Satan’s bride. Obedience to God will only be had by disobedience and resistance to the temporal authority by rejecting the mark that will allow you to participate in the Babylonian economic system. Those participating and party to this system will be judged and will face the full wrath of God. Whose bride will you be? Remember the scriptures
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24
How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.” 1 Kings 18:21
“Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.” James 4:4
Know therefore this day, and consider it in thine heart, that the LORD he is God in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: there is none else. Thou shalt keep therefore his statutes, and his commandments, which I command thee this day, that it may go well with thee, and with thy children after thee, and that thou mayest prolong thy days upon the earth, which the LORD thy God giveth thee, forever.” Deuteronomy 4:39-40
I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.” Exodus20:2-6
That is how I read Romans 13.

________________________________________

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

The following article was written by my dear friend Andrew Mikel. He is a true patriot, a real hero, and a soldier of Lord God Most High.
Tyrants who claim regal authority to rule over a kingdom cannot receive the conscientious subjection of Christians. a. Christians can no more submit for conscience sake to a tyrant who sits upon the throne (by God's providence) than they can submit for conscience sake to the beast (Rev. 13:1-8) or to Satan who both rule by God's providential will.
b. In fact, tyrants ought to be actively resisted for conscience sake by the following means: not granting to them conscientious subjection, not acknowledging them to be the ordinance of God, not honoring them as the minister of God to thee for good, disobeying their unlawful commands, testifying against their wicked rule, praying for the demise of their throne which is established upon wickedness, fleeing their wrath when necessary, and as a last resort revolting against their tyrannical rule when force is necessary for self-defence.
c. This is not sedition, treason, nor revolutionary anarchy, unless one is also willing to condemn the approved testimony of saints in biblical history and in extra-biblical history of these crimes (yea even willing to condemn God Himself for approving such civil resistance), for such a view of lawful resistance against tyrants is neither foreign to Scripture nor to our Christian forefathers.
d. Consider the following incidents of lawful resistance against tyrants in Scripture (this list could easily be multiplied so as to include many more examples, but this should suffice to demonstrate the biblical warrant of lawful resistance against tyrants).

(1) Abraham resisted the wicked alliance of kings who had conquered Sodom and Gomorrah, and did not acknowledge them to be "the minister of God" merely because they had gained a military power to rule (in God's providence), but rather Abraham defeated them and rescued Lot from their clutches (Gen. 14:13-16).
(2) Moses did not recognize Pharaoh as "the ordinance of God", but resisted his tyranny and delivered Israel from servitude in Egypt (Ex. 7-14).
(3) Judges such as Othniel (Judg. 3:8-11), Ehud (Judg. 3:12-30), Shamgar (Judg. 3:31), Deborah and Barak (Judg. 4), Gideon (Judg. 6-8), Jephthah (Judg.11-12), and Samson (Judg. 13-16) resisted tyrants who ruled over Israel rather than granting to them subjection for conscience sake.
(4) David did not subject himself for conscience sake to Absalom as a "higher power" to whom honor was due as "the ordinance of God", but resisted him even though Absalom had won the hearts of all the people of Israel and had gained military control of Israel (2 Sam. 16:15; 2 Sam. 18:6-8).
(5) Elijah did not honor Ahab as "the minister of God" for good, but resisted him by fleeing from him and his wicked queen (1 Kgs. 17:3; 1 Kgs. 19:3), and by taking the sword from the hands of Ahab so that he and the people slew the prophets of Baal (1 Kgs. 18:40).
(6) Elijah did not acknowledge the lawful authority of king Ahaziah to rule over Israel, for he resisted the king by not obeying the king's order to compear before him and even brought God's fiery judgment upon the representatives of Ahaziah's authority (2 Kgs. 1:9-13).
(7) Jehoiada did not subject himself for conscience sake to the tyrant Athaliah, but put her to death even though she accused all those who resisted her of treason (2 Chron. 23:12-15).
(8) God Himself resisted the idolatrous kings of Israel by not acknowledging them to be ministers whom He appointed (Hos. 8:4).
(9) Jesus instructed His disciples that when they were delivered up to gentile kings for Christ's sake, rather than acknowledging them to be "the ordinance of God", they were to testify against them (Mt. 10:18), and to flee their tyranny rather than submit to them for conscience sake (Mt. 10:23).
(10) God gives wings to the church to flee from the persecution which Satan brings against her by means of tyrannical civil and ecclesiastical government rather than commanding the church to render conscientious subjection to such tyranny (Rev. 12:14).
(11) "The prince of this world" (Jn. 14:30) is to be resisted by Christians (Jms. 4:7). If Satan (who grants power to wicked tyrants to rule) is to be resisted, should not tyrants who rule by Satan's wicked power also be resisted? If we cannot be subject for conscience sake to Satan, how can we be subject for conscience sake to those who rule by his power ? Semper Fi

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Prepare for Sticker Shock at Supermarket

While drinking my morning coffee and browsing the news. It was this article on Americans being prepared for sticker shock at the supermarket that caught my attention. The article like the majority of things proceeding from the mouths of the MSM is horse manure. Not that I disagree with the premise that food prices are about to skyrocket, what I disagree with are the reasons they give as to why. The thinking is illogical, and if I am nothing else I am a logical thinker. I enjoy doing logic puzzles in my spare time, when I am not reading, just so you know how this little brain operates.
So what is my problem with the reasoning of this article. First of all from the year 2000 - 2007 the worlds money supply doubled, yes doubled. We should take note this was before all the spending, bailouts and stimulus occuring after this period. This means an even larger increase in the money supply. You should notice the chart in the article showing the upward trend in food prices. You will notice at the beginning of the chart it is pretty much level, but it begins to rise upward as the money supply is increased. Now when money is printed at the astronomical rate it has been over the almost ten years, it has the effect to make your dollar worth less, this means it takes more dollars to buy something than it did before. This has to do with a very simple economic fact-the more scarce a thing the more valuable it is, the more abundant the cheaper it is. Paper money is over abundant, therefore it is cheap! Compare it to another currency today and look back a few years and you will see the loss of the dollars value.
Next the article states that the reason prices are going up is because we are recovering from a recession, while at the same time telling us that there is an"unemployment rate that's expected to linger near a three-decade high for at least another year." Now how does one know that they are in a recession or a depression? One of the major indicators is the unemployment rate. Notice the present rate is at a three decade high! Next you will notice that the reason food prices are going to rise according to the writer of this article is because "that's the reality of supply and demand in the global marketplace" and "in part, to growing demand from emerging markets like China and India and rising oil prices". Let us see if can translate this newspeak. Prices are going to soar because of the demand for food, especially in areas like China and India and because of rising oil prices. Did you get that? This makes sense with a greater demand for food we have more scarcity, which elevates the cost for food, oil is a factor in the production of food so this also makes sense. Unfortunately, what the article does not say is that prices will increase for Americans because Americans are demanding more food. In fact with unemployment at its highest rate in decades and being expected to stay there for some time Americans will buy less. This will be even more exasperated due to the devaluing of the dollar and the global demand for food commodities in places like China and India. Now the article says we are having a global food crises. I wonder why? While Americans will see the price of food soar, while they are buying less of it, Americans will continue to pay through taxation farmers not to farm (CRP). This of course artificially increases the cost of food by making food more scarce than it would naturally be if the government was not paying farmers NOT TO FARM!
So here is a brief summation of the article in plain old fashioned english. Americas economy is going down the toilet. We are in a depression but we will not experience deflation at the supermarket because China and India are doing well enough that they will demand enough of Americas food supply to make demand high while the loss of the dollars value will likewise cause the amount of dollars Americans will need to buy food to rise significantly (Inflation).

Friday, July 24, 2009

Obama Care it's a Lemon

Obama turns health care focus to families, voters
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA?SITE=VTBEN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Of course, we would expect no less. No good used car sales man would sell his lemon any other way than directly to the buyer. Obama’s Health care is just that a lemon! No! We cannot make lemonade out if it either. This lemon is rotten.
The biggest problem with healthcare is that government is already controlling a major portion of this industry. Surprise America, YOU DO NOT HAVE A FREE MARKET HEALTH CARE SYSTEM! We are just taking the next step, because government is not efficient at running anything, but very good at ruining things. All of its interference has led to a system that is of course failing, government is going to fix it, the problem is; it is the mess that government created. Government being a use of force, has little incentive to let loose of power once it has confiscated it, and it never admits that it in fact caused the problem in the first place! Our present health care crisis, if there is one, was caused precisely because of government interference, Medicaid and Medicare and 136, 000 pages of government rules and regulations upon the health care industry. That is more pages than even the all powerful IRS has which requires business and industry to hire full time legal staffs and accountants to deal with. So what is the answer! Get government out of healthcare! It is certainly not to hand them more power to screw up the system even worse than they already have, and add another 136, 000 pages!

The reason people are losing their health insurance should be obvious; “It’s the economy stupid”! The list of businesses that have closed their doors is rather long and it is growing, most people are insured through their employers. The best way to obtain insurance is through your employee, it is non taxable income, a free benefit, an added bonus! Those who purchase their own insurance have no such luxury. That is of course government policy at work as well. Those who are insured through their employer pay no tax on the amount paid for their health insurance. Those who buy their own insurance are taxed on their income with which they buy insurance. Such laws are unconstitutional, but hey what’s a piece of paper. I mean it is only the rule of law. If any one knows that laws are meant to broken, just ask those who are making them. Unlike ordinary Americans those who make Law are somehow now above it. Or are they?
That businesses are closing is quite simply because the government by interfering with the market has created an economic crisis through the Fed and its monetary policy as well as GSEs like Fannie and Freddie, which is much too lengthy to detail here. It is sufficient to say when the government takes money from one area and gives it to another; it is not creating any thing new it is merely taking something from one person what belongs to them and giving it to another to whom it does not belong. In the case of bail out and stimulus it takes it from the productive and working taxpayer and gives it to those who have failed and have proven themselves unable to compete in the free market, which means those who have performed well or done their jobs well are the losers, it penalizes the successful. They take scarce resources from one sector and allocate them to proven losers, or to government projects, which is always a proven loser!
Why government wants nationalized healthcare is really simple it is a way to confiscate more of your income, while pretending to give you something in return. Government is in fact broke; it can’t afford Medicaid or Medicare. Thus a new scheme or in reality an old one; take from the healthy productive sector to fund the unhealthy unproductive sector. The problem is this will ultimately lead to rationing. The free market rations but it is blind, no one is making value judgments. Under a centrally planned healthcare system men will ration. They will set criteria and place value on life.
Mr. Obama in his appeal to the people, the voters does what politicians do best he appeals to fear as his words display, “14,000 Americans will continue to lose their health insurance every single day” and "If we do not reform health care, your premiums and out-of-pocket costs will continue to skyrocket," Yes that is what happens when the government causes inflation, that hidden tax which devalues the dollar. It means we pay more because our dollar buys less! Of course those who have their healthcare paid for by others, don’t think about the fact the resources are scarce; after all they aren’t paying the bill. Only those who pay for it-not government- understand that tough choices have to be made.
Now Mr. Obama wants us to believe that government can somehow afford to provide medical care to Americans better than they can themselves. To trust this would be ludicrous! I mean these are the same people who pay hundreds of dollars for a hammer or a toilet seat.
Obama is promising security and stability to you. The question we need to ask is at what cost?
How exactly is that, if Americans cannot afford it now? For some unknown reason people seem to forget who is providing for government in the first place. It is the productive; any one who makes a living that does not work for government and pays taxes. Now, when the government takes control it is not giving you a free service; for it cannot. Hospitals, clinics, equipment, doctors, nurses, housekeeping and maintenance all have to be paid, and pay for we will. But more important is the fact that by funding health care government will also take all the decisions concerning your healthcare out of your hands and put it into the hands of government agencies created for this purpose. These agencies bureaucracies are an addition to what we are already paying. Planning healthcare will require that government will have to make choices as to who will receive what, when and where. The very fact that as individuals we have to choose what is important concerning healthcare, what we can live with and without likewise reveals that government will be forced to make these same choices. Again we must ask; how will government allocate these scarce resources? What criteria will they use in determining who, what, when, where? Who will take and have priority under a government system. According to Mr. Obama the government, scientists and ethicists will decide. The government will ration healthcare according to standards set and fixed by government. Let us look to those who will be setting these standards. Mr. Holdren the new science tsar and what he promotes:
* Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
* The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
* Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
* People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables) “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
* A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives — using an armed international police force. Read the full article here: http://www.thecitizen.com/~citizen0/node/38012
Let us take a look Peter Singer the Princeton bioethics professor and philosopher. Mr. Singer like Mr. Holdren doesn’t quite view things like ordinary Americans do. He believes the government should ration health care, and that government and men like he are better able to judge which life has more value than another.
What are some of his criteria; “Governments implicitly place a dollar value on a human life when they decide how much is to be spent on health care programs and how much on other public goods that are not directed toward saving lives.” Now, I always felt that life was something that was beyond price; that was of infinite value. Mr. Singer does not believe in the sanctity of human life, it is a dead and outdated mode of thinking according to him.
“The death of a teenager is a greater tragedy than the death of an 85-year-old, and this should be reflected in our priorities.
I would think this depends on which one you are, and upon your loved ones. Of course Mr. Singer does not regard things in such a way. As a matter of fact, there is little which Mr. Singer believes or promotes that ordinary Americans could find any common ground on which they agreed with Mr. Singer.
“The debate over health care reform in the United States should start from the premise that some form of health care rationing is both inescapable and desirable”.
Excuse me Mr. Singer those of us who pay for their own healthcare in reality do apply rationing to the same. We have limited resources and we decide how to allocate the same. Mr. Singer wants the government to ration health care for all, and rather than the individual deciding, government will decide! The real problem here is that government should not be paying for health care at all!
You can read Mr. Singer’s defense of rationing healthcare here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/magazine/19healthcare-t.html?_r=4&pagewanted=1
“On the contrary, once we abandon those doctrines about the sanctity of human life that collapse as soon as they are questioned, it is the refusal to accept killing that, in some cases, is horrific.”
“Infants are sentient beings who are neither rational nor self- conscious. So if we turn to consider the infants in themselves, independently of the attitudes of their parents, since their species is not relevant to their moral status, the principles that govern the wrongness of killing non-human animals who are sentient but not rational or self-conscious must apply here too. As we saw, the most plausible arguments for attributing a right to life to a being apply only if there is some awareness of oneself as a being existing over time, or as a continuing mental self.”
http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/1993----.htm
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/medical_ethics/me0049.html
Mr Singer believes in infanticide, euthanasia for the disabled and elderly. Hmmm, this might make one think twice as to whether family and loved ones should be left with these decisions or government bureaucracies. Government run health care will remove these decisions from you and place them in the hands of those who have similar values to those quoted above.
Now that we have examined two very influential thinkers, who do you think should decide on where your scarce resources go? You or the government, those are your options. You make your own choices according to your worldview, or you allow others to make your choices for you. As far as what you spend, where, when, and how, you can bet that you will pay if you are productive under the government plan. If you are not productive, you might get some un-free care at the expense of someone else, but how long will the government pay for the unproductive at the expense and ire of the productive? Most certainly an appropriate value will be applied to you according to what government and men like Holdren and Singer feel your life is worth. Still sure you want government healthcare, if so you deserve it!

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Just A Hobbit

Anyone who has read Tolkien’s, The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings series knows Hobbits are just ordinary folk, who enjoy the simple things in life. They work, have gardens; and they love eating and gathering together with family and friends. They avoid all the confusion and power struggles of the world and its principalities, and for the most part they have no desire to leave the comforts and safety of the Shire and home.
That is until Sauron and the ring, both are incredibly evil. Sauron is the mastermind behind the ring, the ring is his means to control and enslave men and all the inhabitants of middle earth. Those places in allegiance with Sauron and under his power are dark and foreboding; they are the men of the east, the orcs and the like. The men of the west, the elves, the dwarves, cling to what remains of the areas not yet overcome by the darkness, although it is spreading and infiltrating the hearts of its great men.
Yet, it is not the great and mighty men which have the ability to destroy the ring, their greatness and ambition makes them especially vulnerable to the power of the ring. The heroes recognize their own weakness, and thus it is that Frodo with the support of Sam are entrusted with the almost insurmountable task of destroying the ring. This involves a long and perilous journey, one in which our heroes are often found longing for home and the simplicity of the Shire.
In the real world Sauron is the power of darkness, here in the West we call him the Devil and Satan and he is the adversary of men. The ring that binds them all is the system that we call government, it is unrestrained and unchecked and its goal and ambition is control of the whole world and the enslavement of its inhabitants. The men who have fallen under the sway of the ring are politicians, successful, wealthy, powerful, businessmen, professors and lawyers. They are ambitious and driven, they desire recognition and honor; they see themselves as higher, more intelligent, more enlightened, and more capable than ordinary humans. They do not recognize the evil of the ring; they see only the power and authority that it gives them, they are blinded to its very blackness and darkness, and the death and destruction it sows. They have lost the truth that life requires light, and that without it all living things die!
So what can a hobbit do? I am just a hobbit, I enjoy my simple life, my greatest joys and pleasures are found at home, and the work I do there, with family and friends, cooking and feeding the same, and in my garden. I am content at home in the shire. I have no desire for power, position or prestige. I have no yearning to control others or dictate the lives of others. I have my haven and am content there, but I am fully aware I can not force or control others to make them live it. Yet, I see the darkness and it is spreading, I see it in the hearts and minds of those who we have appointed as leaders, I see it in the system, I see the power of the ring and it is spreading and growing and encompassing the land, and its shadow is looming largely over the Shire.
So I ask again; what can a hobbit do to combat this darkness this evil that is spreading and threatening to destroy the Shire? Simple, foolish, not overly gifted, or extraordinary in any way, what can a hobbit do? Do we look to and depend upon the leaders, who because of their natures are especially vulnerable to the sway and hold of the ring? Can we use the power of the ring to gain control and force others to obey and live by what we believe is best? No, none of these will work. We must come out from the Shire and go off into the world and we must destroy the ring and its power, but we can not do this or achieve this alone, it will take many hobbit friends, for we will need to support and to sustain one another; for it is a long and perilous journey to the mountains and fires of Mordor. Yet, it is only we Hobbits who have the ability to resist the ring and its power, for in our hearts we only long for home, the simple things, and the bright light of day!

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Meltdown by Thomas E Woods Jr

I just finished reading meltdown. Great book, easy read! It gives a clear and concise explanation of our current economic crisis, and what caused it!
My favorite part of the book is as follows:"If spending on munitions really makes a country wealthy, the United States and Japan should do the following: Each should seek to build the most spectacular naval fleet in history, an enormous armada of gigantic, powerful, technologically advanced ships. The two fleets should meet in the Pacific. Naturally, since they would want to avoid the loss of life that accompanies war. all naval personnel would be evacuated from the ships. At this point the U.S. and Japan would sink each other's fleets. Then they could celebrate how much richer they had made themselves by devoting labor, steel, and countless other inputs to the production of things that would wind up at the bottom of the ocean."
I think we can take the point further and state that war does not bring prosperity, as real war is so much more destructive and involves the loss of human life and the creative potential of that life that can never be replaced as well as infrasructure and personal property that took years to acquire.
My next favorite is where he quotes Adam Smith (one of my personal favorites), on the diffference between consumptive expenditutre and productive expenditure. "A thousand ploughman consume fully as much corn and cloth in the course of a year as a regiment of soldiers. But the difference between the kinds of consumption is immense. The labor of the ploughman has, during the year, served to call into existence a quantity of property, which not only repays the corn and cloth which he has consumed, but repays it with a profit. The soldier on the other hand produces nothing. What he has consumed is gone, and in its place is left absolutely vacant. The country is the poorer for his consumption, to the full amount of what he has consumed. It is not the poorer, but the richer for what the ploughman has consumed, because during the time he was consuming it, he has reproduced what does more than replace it."
Obviously the soldier is just one type of consumptive expenditure, all government and those who work for the same would fall into this category.

Friday, May 8, 2009

Your Primary Civic Duty – A Call to Action

The following quotes are from the book; "Human Action" by Ludwig Von Mises.

“All present-day political issues concern problems commonly called economic. All arguments advanced in contemporary discussion of social and public affairs deal with fundamental matters of praxeology and economics. Everybody’s mind is preoccupied with economic doctrines”……. “Everybody thinks of economics whether he is aware of it or not. In joining a political party and in casting his ballot, the citizen implicitly takes a stand upon essential economic theories”……….
“There is no means by which anyone can evade his personal responsibility. Whoever neglects to examine to the best of his abilities all the problems involved voluntarily surrenders his birthright to a self-appointed elite of supermen. In such vital matters blind reliance upon “experts” and uncritical acceptance of popular catchwords and prejudices is tantamount to the abandonment of self-determination and to yielding to other people’s domination. As conditions are today, nothing can be more important to every intelligent man than economics. His own fate and that of his progeny is at stake”.
“Very few are capable of contributing any consequential idea to the body of economic thought. But all reasonable men are called upon to familiarize themselves with the teachings of economics. This is, in our age, the primary civic duty.”

Why is it our primary civic duty to familiarize ourselves with economic theory?

“The body of economic knowledge is an essential element in the structure of human civilization; it is the foundation upon which modern industrialism and all the moral, intellectual, technological, and therapeutical achievements of the last century have been built. It rests with men whether they will make the proper use of the rich treasure with which this knowledge provides them or whether they will leave it unused. But if they fail to take the best advantage of it and disregard its teachings and warnings, they will not annul economics; they will stamp out society and the human race.”

If you don’t know where to start I recommend reading
“Economics in One Lesson” by Henry Hazlitt (183 pages)
http://www.amazon.com/Economics-One-Lesson-Shortest-Understand/dp/0517548232

“Basic Economics” by Thomas Sowell (396 pages)
http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Economics-3rd-Ed-Economy/dp/0465002609/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1241803091&sr=1-1

For more in depth study read FA Hayek, Murray Rothbard, Ludwig Von Mises.